The battle for the best AI Code Editor is heating up. For a long time, Cursor has been the undisputed king. But Antigravity has entered the arena with backing from Google DeepMind. Which one should you choose in 2025?
1. AI Model Support
- Cursor: Primarily uses Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o. You can switch models easily. Known for high-quality single-file edits.
- Antigravity: Exclusively optimized for Gemini 3 Pro/Ultra. While you have less choice, the integration is deeper. Gemini 3's 2M token context window is the main differentiator.
2. Context Management
This is where they diverge structurally.
Cursor uses RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation). When you ask a question, it searches your local files, picks the top 10-20 most relevant chunks, and sends them to the LLM. It's fast, but sometimes misses things.
Antigravity attempts to stuff the entire active context into the prompt. If you are working on a feature that touches 50 files, Antigravity reads all 50. This results in much higher accuracy for "system-wide" questions.
3. Autocomplete (Tab-Complete)
Cursor's "Copilot++" (Shadow Workspace) predicts your next edit by actually running a background model that sees where your cursor is going.
Antigravity's autocomplete is slightly slower (latency wise) but proposes larger chunks of code. It often suggests entire functions rather than just lines.
4. Pricing
- Cursor: $20/month for Pro.
- Antigravity: Currently Free (Public Preview). Google Cloud pricing applies for enterprise API usage.
Conclusion
Choose Cursor if: You want a stable, polished experience and prefer Claude 3.5.
Choose Antigravity if: You work in large codebases, need massive context, or develop heavily in Python/Jupyter.