Antigravity vs Cursor vs Copilot
The 2025 AI IDE Showdown. Should you switch to the "Agent-First" Antigravity, or stick with the "Chat-First" incumbents?
| Feature | Antigravity | Cursor | GitHub Copilot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core AI Model | Gemini 3 Pro + Claude | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | GPT-4o / Claude 3.5 |
| Context Window | 2,000,000+ Tokens | 200,000 Tokens | 32k - 128k Tokens |
| Workflow Type | Agentic (Planning) | Chat-Assisted | Autocomplete |
| Terminal Control | Full Autonomous | Command Generation | CLI Suggestions |
| Multimodal | Video/Audio/Image Native | Image Only | Image Only |
| Pricing | Free (Preview) | $20/month | $10/month |
Why Antigravity?
It's not just an editor; it's an Agent Manager. You don't write code; you review plans. With 2 Million tokens context, it understands your whole architecture, not just the open file.
Why Cursor?
The Control Freak's choice. If you want to write the code yourself but faster, Cursor's UX is unbeatable. It's stable, fast, and stays out of your way until you need it.
Why Copilot?
Enterprise Standard. If you already pay for VS Code and GitHub Enterprise, it's just there. Great for simple autocomplete but lacks the "Agentic" depth of 2025 tools.
The Verdict
Copilot is for Completion. Cursor is for Speed. Antigravity is for Delegation.
Start Delegating to Antigravity →